Voted the "no opinion" option, not because I don't have an opinion but because I'd rather elaborate it.
I've missed plenty of items during my hiatus, and I would love to put my paws on them

so from a personal perspective, having a chance to do so would be glorious.
But I see a potential downside to selling them for FCs. If it does not sell it's a waste of time for Firn, but if it does sell... the value of FCs will probably raise.
It's already high enough (we don't see FCs for sale at 100k anymore) and having more uses for them will make them even more precious. Who is gonna sell an FC then, and at what price?
If the FC price seems very high
to me, I wonder what newer users would think of it...
So for me it would make more sense auctioning than selling for FCs.
BUT I've seen Firn's auctions end up in very low values indeed. And if that's the case then there is no point.
Why? Because an user may get a bargain, and another user will be equally annoyed to find out that his treasured old item is worth so little. So you made one user happy and another user unhappy, and we did not benefit the site as a whole.
What I've seen, and which in my opinion is interesting, is what happens when returning users did a huge number of auctions. (I think the last one was Natsuyuki?)
Suddently there is some auctions going on, and if you want to bid on any of them you need to sell your own stuff.
Oh, I do have spares lying on my wardrobe, but I hardly ever care to sell them for FPs. I mean, what for? I have easily 1 million FPs and nothing to spend them on, so I either sell my items for FCs or trade them for other items (which is nice but hard).
But when there is something to bid on, I do need to replenish my FPs - therefore I have to sell.
So to those returning users auctions we had to add items from several potential buyers as myself, who wanted to make sure they had enough funds for bidding. And suddently the market is filled with many other items, which may attract yet other buyers who are not interested (or can't afford) the auctioned items.
This last for a while and then dies away as the auctions end.
My question is: is there any feasible way to replicate this from an admin perspective? And even better, to make it last?
What if instead of auctioning many items at once, we had periodical auctions? Let's say Firn auctions one item a week or a month. I might be interested in it, so I would rather have some funds saved just in case. Sometimes I'll bid, other times I won't, but I'll be making sure to have FPs just in case.
Would that create enough interest to make us hoarders sell our items for FPs? Would the marketplace become more lively, long-term?
That's what I wonder.
Because in my humble opinion it would be a success only if it creates some kind of reaction in us, the users.
(Which is always a wild bet...)
Also regarding "old" items.
I'm not sure oldest items are the most wanted ones. Most of us collectors have been around for a long time. Yeah, I still don't have a few of the old items, but I also don't have plenty of stuff which is only 2 to 5 years old.
I suppose it would be a good idea looking into which items are the most wanted ones, by the average user. And sell those.
I imagine it would not be hard for starkad to create a list of the items which have been added to more wishlists (preferably wishlists of active users). This could be a good reference - even if most users don't use the wishlist exhaustively you could get an idea of which items or sets are most wanted.
I don't know, just throwing in my two cents.
