Hey everybody! I've been gone for awhile.
I notice that a lot of people who depend on the social safety net (whether it's Medicaid/Medicare, food stamps, housing subsidies, etc.) have a deep resentment towards those who abuse the system. The problem is, I don't know anyone who abuses the system. Oh, I'm sure they exist--but it's an insignificant minority, and not enough to actually make a meaningful impact on the program. And I know some people who depend on these programs who don't meet the bar of "respectable." I know a lot of artists and musicians who depend on food stamps, but I can imagine people telling them that if they can afford a new amp they don't need food stamps. Problem is, of course, that if they don't buy the new amp they won't be able to perform and if they can't perform they won't have an income. To my mind, our current safety net system punishes individual priorities. Another example would be thinking someone doesn't need food stamps because they buy nice clothes. But what if they need nice clothes for work? What if they need nice clothes because they're LOOKING for work and no one will hire them if they don't look professional? Or maybe it's an important part of their mental health and self care, like in order to feel okay with themselves they need to look clean and presentable. Whatever the circumstance, it is their life and they get to decide their priorities, they get to decide how to allocate their resources, and no one should have to starve because they bought a nice blazer for a job interview or something.
But because the idea of "welfare" or "charity" (I don't think these programs are really either of those things, but that's a whole different conversation) is so emotionally loaded, I think a lot of people who benefit from these programs find it hard not to judge other benefactors from the programs. It's hard for me to understand. My family has tried to apply for some programs in the past, but because of our unusual circumstances we don't fit in any of the boxes and we haven't been approved. I think this experience, of needing relief and not being able to get it, is more common than abuse of the system.
But what I really REALLY don't understand is, well, exactly what your aunt said. That Trump is only going after the "bad guys." I've heard people saying this about his anti-immigrant bs too, that he's only talking about deporting "the criminals." What this view point fails to take into account is that in Trump's capitalist-white-nationalist-worldview, anyone who depends on welfare programs is a failure who deserves to suffer (that's the capitalist position) and anyone who is an undocumented immigrant is by definition a criminal (the white nationalist position). So when he says "we're going after the bad guys" he's actually talking about EVERYONE, because he thinks the label applies to everyone. He's not even lying about what he's going to do, but his supporters often don't have the same worldview as he does and so they don't really understand that he's referring to
them.
Or at least, that's my current theory. I've been trying to spend more time around people who might have voted for him to try to understand, but it's been really frustrating. Like...there's a town near me that used to be a fairly affluent mill town, but then the mill closed and all the jobs left and now it's really depressed, there's no work, a huge alcoholism problem, you know the drill. But so many of the people in this town think the problems started when a low-income apartment building was built near the downtown area. All these people I have spoken to think that what destroyed the economy was not the mill closing down and the jobs leaving, but rather an apartment building. This is nonsense. The apartment building wasn't even built until AFTER the economic downturn in this town. But I guess it's easier to blame poor people than a company??? I honestly don't know, I personally don't find that easier...